Monday, March 26, 2012

Kazapa: Stats for SEO


I'm tired of answering questions to promote sites using kazapy, so let it dry statistics do.

Website: second-level domain.
The core query: VC HF (more than 300 thousands. requests vordstatu, about 500 competitors - more patience was not enough to check ).
Objective: To achieve at least something. Great Expectations is not tortured, was a ridiculous goal of money to achieve acceptable results for further, more serious work.
Internal optimization: nothing special. Easy rirayt texts, a short article on the front, three key Titley.
Previously used methods: easy to purchase linkfide (200 links) - the result is zero, no movement at all.
The filter in kazape: the index of H, external links to three, second-level domains, and from 3 months. More - nothing.

In general, it was a venture. Work - will not work - I will not cry. Finally managed to get in google in the top -50. In Yandex - the top 100. A total of 342 references were purchased for less than 5tys. rubles ( not monthly - only ). This is quite a selection of Related. T. e. error to the mean will be less than 5%. Then the points.

The average price - £ 13.92. for the link.
The average TCI - 10.84. Restrictions on the TCI should not be made. T. e. Webmasters can put on my best, but most of the links went to sites tITsistye.
Pages with PR - 4 (1. 1%), sites of the Yak - 6 (1. 7%) sites in DMOZ - 9 (2. 6%).

Today I drove all the links in the. seolib. ru. and ordered the test. The results of sharing with you.

Pages in the index I - 45.02 %.
Pages in the index T - 70.76 %.
References in the index I (t. e. the robot sees a link to the cached IP) - 31.87 %.
References in the index T - 61.11 %.

Sites that are not found in H or in G (complete fufel ) - 14.91 %.


Further details on the filters. Check on the control sites ( their ) showed that the results that follow below, most accurately described as ' similar in general to the truth '.

Sites under the filter I - 32.74 % ( the only one - in seolibe does not say that the filter we have in mind ).
Sites under the AGS - 11.11%.
of them.
Sites in the index I, but I'm under the filter - 5.26 % or a total of 18 pieces.
Sites in the index I, but under the AGU - 2 pieces.
Sites in the index I, but with a filter and AGS - no.

Sites which I do not have filters: 39.18 %. Sites which I, in F and do not have filters: 14.91 %.

Clearly, I have other sites ( at this point in my kazape 60 projects, and there are more large customers), and other results, but this project is indicative of the fact that there was nothing in it is not mingled, though I thought and still think . To mix the background, or swap reference TCI pump - is the second case. Promotion - is the work of the head, rather than a pattern. Sometimes you need and just a fantasy. Here I bought a left-foot 50 is very good links, or simply good 140 or 250 would suit me - just 5tys. rubles. Do it and you - it's not me.

Some information for webmasters. Not so long ago, we launched the coefficients for the complexity. Links have become more expensive. The more difficult task - the higher the price, so the price of 20-30 rubles for a null reference - no longer a rarity. Truth and optimizers are smarter, so that good projects are provided with sufficiently rigid filters through which to bullshit does not slip.

We continue to give the 12- month warranty optimizers and brutally pussy webmasters who do not comply with this. No one gives more guarantees so far. The actual amount taken was 2 options. 3% of the total turnover of the company from the start - most of them are sold sites. But even so - we are compensated for the loss of advertisers at their own expense.

Yet we are at the stage of direct billing agreements with Yandex, Webmoney and RBKMani. So soon direct transfers electronic money cards, bank transfer as well as translations of legal entities. no robokass. Quickly, safely, efficiently. All you favorite.

yours. KAZAPA. ru.

---------------------------------.
Sign up. to update the blog with one click!. Read on Twitter!. ::. Advertising blog.

No comments:

Post a Comment